General Dentist Owner
Compensation Benchmark
$220K – $360K
Side-by-side comparison · 2025–2026
Compare revenue, profit margins, owner compensation, startup costs, patient economics and valuation metrics to determine which practice model offers the strongest financial performance.
| Best For | Winner |
|---|---|
| Lower Startup Cost | General Dentistry |
| Higher Revenue Per Patient | Orthodontics |
| Larger Patient Base | General Dentistry |
| Higher Profit Margins | Orthodontics |
| Easier Practice Sale | General Dentistry |
| Premium Pricing Power | Orthodontics |
| Metric | General Dentistry | Orthodontics |
|---|---|---|
| Annual Revenue | $1.2M – $2.6M | $1.8M – $3.5M |
| EBITDA Margin | 18 – 30% | 32 – 38% |
| Owner Compensation | $220K – $360K | $320K – $480K |
| Patients Per Month | 120 – 180 active visits | 40 – 80 case starts |
| Revenue Per Patient | $900 – $1,100/yr | $4,500 – $6,500/case |
| Startup Cost | $515K – $1.0M | $650K – $1.2M |
| Practice Valuation | 3.2× – 4.5× SDE | 4.0× – 5.5× SDE |
Revenue Per Patient
Winner: Orthodontics
Patient Volume
Winner: General Dentistry
Profit Margin
Winner: Orthodontics
Market Size
Winner: General Dentistry
Revenue Sources
Revenue Sources
How each model converts patients into collections.
| Driver | General Dentistry | Orthodontics |
|---|---|---|
| Patient Volume | High — 1,200–1,800 active | Moderate — 400–800 active cases |
| Treatment Value | $180 – $320/visit | $4,500 – $6,500/case |
| Insurance Dependence | High — 60–75% insurance | Moderate — 40–55% insurance |
| Cash Pay Potential | Moderate — cosmetic add-ons | High — elective treatment plans |
Lifetime value and visit economics — the core financial differentiator.
| Metric | General Dentistry | Orthodontics |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Per Patient | $900 – $1,100/yr | $4,500 – $6,500/case |
| Visits Per Year | 1.8 – 2.4 | 12 – 24 (treatment phase) |
| Lifetime Value | $3,500 – $8,500 | $6,000 – $12,000 |
| Retention Period | 5 – 8 years | 18 – 30 months (active tx) |
Revenue per chair and provider productivity.
| Metric | General Dentistry | Orthodontics |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Per Chair | $350K – $550K/yr | $500K – $700K/yr |
| Revenue Per Provider | $800K – $1.4M | $1.2M – $2.0M |
| Revenue Per Staff Member | $120K – $180K | $150K – $220K |
General Dentistry
Orthodontics
| Expense | General Dentistry | Orthodontics |
|---|---|---|
| Clinical Payroll | 28 – 35% | 22 – 28% |
| Supplies | 6 – 10% | 4 – 7% |
| Facility Costs | 5 – 8% | 5 – 8% |
| Marketing | 3 – 6% | 4 – 8% |
Payer mix drives margin and pricing power.
General Dentistry
Higher Insurance Dependence
60 – 75%
Orthodontics
Higher Cash-Pay Opportunity
40 – 55%
| Metric | General Dentistry | Orthodontics |
|---|---|---|
| Insurance Revenue % | 60 – 75% | 40 – 55% |
| Cash Revenue % | 20 – 35% | 40 – 55% |
| Financing Revenue % | 5 – 12% | 15 – 30% |
General Dentist Owner
Compensation Benchmark
$220K – $360K
Orthodontic Practice Owner
Compensation Benchmark
$320K – $480K
Multi-Practice Dental Owner
Compensation Benchmark
$450K – $750K+
Multi-Ortho Practice Owner
Compensation Benchmark
$550K – $900K+
Investment required to launch or acquire each practice model.
General Dentistry
Orthodontics
| Expense | General Dentistry | Orthodontics |
|---|---|---|
| Equipment | $250K – $450K | $300K – $550K |
| Technology | $40K – $80K | $80K – $150K |
| Buildout | $150K – $350K | $150K – $300K |
| Working Capital | $75K – $150K | $100K – $200K |
| Metric | General Dentistry | Orthodontics |
|---|---|---|
| EBITDA Multiple | 4.0× – 6.5× | 5.5× – 8.0× |
| Revenue Multiple | 0.6× – 1.0× | 0.8× – 1.2× |
| SDE Multiple | 3.2× – 4.5× | 4.0× – 5.5× |
$1M Revenue Practice → Estimated Value
General Dentistry
$1.4M – $2.0M
3.8× SDE on $450K SDE
Orthodontics
$2.0M – $2.8M
4.8× SDE on $500K SDE
| Metric | General Dentistry | Orthodontics |
|---|---|---|
| Monthly Production Needed | $120K – $150K | $140K – $180K |
| Patients Needed | 900 – 1,100 active | 60 – 90 cases/yr |
| Months To Break-Even | 18 – 30 months | 24 – 36 months |
Which model gives the best return on invested capital?
If You Invest $500,000
Answer four questions to get a model recommendation based on your clinical interests and financial goals.
Recommended Model
General Dentistry
General dentistry fits your profile — broad patient base, recurring preventive revenue, lower startup costs, and a deep acquisition market support your goals.
Orthodontic practices typically achieve higher EBITDA margins (32–38% vs. 18–30% for general dentistry) and higher revenue per patient ($4,500–$6,500 per case vs. $900–$1,100 per year). However, general dentistry supports a larger patient base, lower startup costs, and easier practice sales. Absolute owner compensation can be comparable at scale — multi-location GP owners earn $450K–$750K+.
General dentistry typically costs $515K–$1.0M to launch or acquire, while orthodontic practices run $650K–$1.2M due to digital scanning, imaging, and treatment system investments. De novo GP buildouts can start lower; ortho requires specialty equipment regardless of acquisition vs. startup.
General dental practices sell more frequently (3,000–4,000 US transactions annually) with a deeper buyer pool of associates and DSOs. SDE multiples of 3.2×–4.5× are well-established. Orthodontic practices trade at premium multiples (4.0×–5.5× SDE) but have fewer buyers and longer days on market.
General dentists maintain 1,200–1,800 active patients and see 120–180 visits per month. Orthodontists manage 400–800 active cases with 40–80 new case starts per month. GP volume is higher; ortho value per patient is 4–6× greater.
Orthodontics derives 40–55% of revenue from insurance vs. 60–75% for general dentistry. Ortho practices capture more cash-pay (40–55%) and patient financing revenue (15–30%), providing stronger pricing power and margin protection.
A $500K investment in general dentistry typically generates $1.2M–$1.8M revenue and $260K–$430K EBITDA (3–5 year payback). The same investment in orthodontics can generate $1.6M–$2.4M revenue and $480K–$860K EBITDA (2.5–4 year payback) — higher margin but requires specialty training and longer break-even on new startups.